- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 20:41:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@davidsgrogan Hm, that's a separate question I think. So I guess we have two questions: * For an abspos child of a flex container, would causing `align-self` and `justify-self` to swap axes (so they match the block/inline axis, like for abspos anywhere else) cause any breaking changes? This requires: * The flex container in question is a column flex container. * The `align-self` and `justify-self` map to different values in an absolute sense. * The abspos child has both insets in an axis set to `auto` (and is therefore statically positioned). * The static positioning rectangle is not equal in size to the abspos item’s margin box in that axis (thus the alignment properties can have an effect in this axis). * For an abspos child of any flex container, would disconnecting `align-self` from the parent’s `align-items` cause any breaking changes? This requires: * The abspos item is statically positioned in an axis (both insets = auto). * The static positioning rectangle is not equal in size to the abspos item’s margin box in that axis. * The `align-self` value is `auto`. * The parent’s `align-items` value is distinguishable from `normal`. So I think those are the cases we need to count? Note that if we don't disconnect `align-items` from abspos children, then having `align-self` take effect on non-statically-positioned abspos items (as specced in css-align-3) would be more likely to be a breaking change, because it would cause all of those absposes to start responding to the `align-items` value of their flex container parents. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5843#issuecomment-880999145 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2021 20:41:22 UTC