- From: carlosame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:38:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> fallback examples fixed to use the actual grammar The syntax is supposed to be this: ```javascript color() = color( [ [<ident> | <dashed-ident>] [ <number-percentage>+ | <string> ] [ / <alpha-value> ]? ]# , <color>? ) ``` where "Each argument represents either an invalid color, as described below, or a valid color", so ```javascript color(prophoto-rgb 0.4835 0.9167 0.2188, display-p3 0.3499 0.9800 0.1399, rgb(33.44% 96.68% 21.07%)) ``` seems correct. If it is not, then the above grammar should be modified as well. Also, the current one probably meant: ```javascript color() = color( [ [<ident> | <dashed-ident>] [ <number-percentage>+ | <string> ] [ / <alpha-value> ]? ]# [, <color>]? ) ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by carlosame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5904#issuecomment-769878443 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 29 January 2021 15:38:26 UTC