> But I feel strongly that the "silent gh" needs to die in English, and no longer spell words with it when I can help it. CSS specifications are an unsuitable venue to promote _possible future spelling reforms_. > since reading W3C specifications represent a significant percentage of my exposure to English, in the absence of contradicting information, I tend to assume that whatever is common in such documents is "normal written English" Yes, that is the normalizing, language activism part. > a technical spec isn't the place to try and move the needle on not-yet-standardard spellings I agree. If the intent is to build up a body of published work which can then be pointed to as evidence of usage, this can be easily accomplished by personal blogs and the like. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5850#issuecomment-757935986 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-configReceived on Monday, 11 January 2021 12:59:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:31:38 UTC