W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > January 2021

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Note implies losing an aspect-ratio when it shouldn't? (#5713)

From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 23:41:39 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-756453548-1610062897-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
OK I guess it looks good, but maybe I would have left the link pointing to [CSS 2 §10.3.4](https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#block-replaced-width) instead of to the more general [CSS 2 §10](https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#q10.0). Because without reading https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio-automatic it may seem that non-replaced elements with aspect ratio may use [CSS 2 §10.3.3](https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/visudet.html#block-width) like in the `stretch` case.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5713#issuecomment-756453548 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 7 January 2021 23:41:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:25 UTC