Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] Details of `format()` and `technology()` values (#6864) from jfkthame via GitHub on 2021-12-10 (public-css-archive@w3.org from December 2021)

From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:52:17 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-990991425-1639144335-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Offhand, I'd be inclined *not* to keep the bare `variations`, just like we don't have a simple `color` keyword here; the technology that the resource depends on should be named specifically. I think that will give us a clearer path forward if some entirely new technology (e.g. a new format for glyph descriptions, with its own distinct technology to handle variations) is added in the future.



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6864#issuecomment-990991425 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 10 December 2021 13:52:19 UTC