- From: Laurence Penney via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:36:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I wonder if `variations-gvar` would be better than `variations-truetype`. This way, both `variations-gvar` and `variations-cff2` identify the SFNT table within an _OpenType_ font that handles glyph variations. Note that, for authors unsure what kind of variable font they have, opening the file with a hex editor and inspecting the first ~200 bytes with a hex editor will show either a `CFF2` or a `glyf` entry. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Lorp Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6864#issuecomment-991024889 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 10 December 2021 14:36:17 UTC