> Also, if this is never supposed to be author-controlled, why is there a thin option? This is my point exactly. The people who are opposing adding the option for wide are arguing that there's no reason for an author to change the scrollbar to wide, but they are completely ignoring the cosmetic control. They are arguing that in order to add a wide option there needs to be some functional reason other than cosmetic... ignoring the fact that there are plenty of other CSS options under the W3C standards that are purely cosmetic, like the scrollbar-color option for example. It's a flawed logic. -- GitHub Notification of comment by WesleyBranton Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6351#issuecomment-903027787 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-configReceived on Saturday, 21 August 2021 01:03:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:42 UTC