- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:48:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `display: contents list-item`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: close wontfix` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <fantasai> Topic: display: contents list-item<br> <fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4022<br> <fantasai> astearns: Proposal is close wontfix?<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: brought up that there's nothing theoretically wrong with 'display: contents list-item' which would generate a ::marker<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: Currently the grammar doesn't allow combining these two<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: My objection to this is just that we don't have any particularly strong reason to do so<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: but there's nothing wrong with it<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: so suggesting close no change<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: but no objection to making it possible if someone thinks this is a useful thing that we should allow<br> <fantasai> astearns: My case in the comments is completely theoretically<br> <fantasai> TabAtkins: I can see it, but I think it's one more thing that we don't necessarily need<br> <fantasai> emilio: seems like one more case that we should avoid, so ok with no change<br> <fantasai> astearns: Any objections to no change?<br> <fantasai> RESOLVED: close wontfix<br> <emilio> s/case that we should/edge case we should<br> <fantasai> astearns: If Mats feels strongly, he could reopen it<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4022#issuecomment-901268875 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 2021 16:48:25 UTC