- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 19:15:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
As in #5537, it would help a lot if I could understand what the desired behavior here was, and why. Right now I'm just looking at a series of testcases showing various behaviors, with no explanation of what's expected or desired and why. It *looks like* @dvoytenko is trying to use these properties to make an element act like a replaced element. Is this right? If so, why? It is def the case that c-i-s shouldn't have any relevance here; the behavior you get from contain:size and c-i-s *should* be identical to the behavior you get from a normal element with enough content to produce the same size. So this is purely a question about aspect-ratio. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5549#issuecomment-701590391 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2020 19:15:42 UTC