Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] aspect-ratio min-content size with % width (#5549)

As in #5537, it would help a lot if I could understand what the desired behavior here was, and why. Right now I'm just looking at a series of testcases showing various behaviors, with no explanation of what's expected or desired and why.

It *looks like* @dvoytenko is trying to use these properties to make an element act like a replaced element. Is this right? If so, why?

It is def the case that c-i-s shouldn't have any relevance here; the behavior you get from contain:size and c-i-s *should* be identical to the behavior you get from a normal element with enough content to produce the same size. So this is purely a question about aspect-ratio.

GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2020 19:15:42 UTC