As in #5537, it would help a lot if I could understand what the desired behavior here was, and why. Right now I'm just looking at a series of testcases showing various behaviors, with no explanation of what's expected or desired and why. It *looks like* @dvoytenko is trying to use these properties to make an element act like a replaced element. Is this right? If so, why? It is def the case that c-i-s shouldn't have any relevance here; the behavior you get from contain:size and c-i-s *should* be identical to the behavior you get from a normal element with enough content to produce the same size. So this is purely a question about aspect-ratio. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5549#issuecomment-701590391 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-configReceived on Wednesday, 30 September 2020 19:15:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:17 UTC