W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2020

[csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] Should contain-intrinsic-size be used for min-height: auto? (#5537)

From: Christian Biesinger via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:14:26 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-706556756-1600794864-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
cbiesinger has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-sizing-4] Should contain-intrinsic-size be used for min-height: auto? ==

For a testcase like the the ones at https://dvoytenko.github.io/aspect-ratio-css/#x-intrinsic-and-float (make the window width smaller; should there be pink visible?), if the aspect-ratio calculated height of the box shrinks below the size from contain-intrinsic-size, should `min-height: auto` keep the height of the box at 300px (from contain-intrinsic-size)?

On the one hand, that's probably the straightforward interpretation of the intrinsic size; on the other hand, the content is not "real", should min-height: auto take it into account? 

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5537 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2020 17:14:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:16 UTC