If we do this, rather than adding a statement like @Loirooriol proposes in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3033 then I think it would be something like: ``` Logical Property Group: <identifier> ``` where the identifier would typically be the most specific common shorthand of all the properties. (`margin`, `padding`, `border-style`, `border-color`, `inset`, etc.) If we go with a statement, I would go with, e.g.: > The longhands of 'border-style' form a logical property group. so we don't have to list everything out. Easier to read, less likely to forget one. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2822#issuecomment-692375919 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-configReceived on Monday, 14 September 2020 23:44:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:16 UTC