- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 22:16:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@cbiesinger Can you identify any case in which an image with an intrinsic width and an aspect-ratio behaves differently from one with an intrinsic width, intrinsic height, and intrinsic aspect ratio? Because per https://www.w3.org/TR/css-images-3/#sizing-terms if you have an intrinsic aspect ratio and either an intrinsic width or height, you also have the missing intrinsic dimension. This paragraph is just saying that this consequence also applies for an explicit aspect ratio. > In general, objects cannot have only two intrinsic dimensions, as any two automatically define the third. However some types of replaced elements, such as form controls, can have an intrinsic width and an intrinsic height, but no intrinsic aspect ratio. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5563#issuecomment-703918431 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 5 October 2020 22:16:02 UTC