Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Note implies losing an aspect-ratio when it shouldn't? (#5713)

I don't think your definition of (1) satisfies this case:
```html
<div style="display: block; width: 200px; border: solid;">
  <div style="height: 100px; aspect-ratio: 1/1;"></div>
</div>
```
As here `justify-self: normal` is stretch per implementations (and https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#justify-block). Although as discussed this definition is incomplete due to not saying that tables, replaced, and some form controls should be `start`


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5713#issuecomment-727124341 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config