W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Note implies losing an aspect-ratio when it shouldn't? (#5713)

From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 02:33:24 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-727124341-1605321203-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I don't think your definition of (1) satisfies this case:
<div style="display: block; width: 200px; border: solid;">
  <div style="height: 100px; aspect-ratio: 1/1;"></div>
As here `justify-self: normal` is stretch per implementations (and https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#justify-block). Although as discussed this definition is incomplete due to not saying that tables, replaced, and some form controls should be `start`

GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5713#issuecomment-727124341 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 14 November 2020 02:33:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:22 UTC