Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox] Should definite cross size be used to compute flex item's transferred size suggestion? (#5663)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-flexbox] Should definite cross size be used to compute flex item's transferred size suggestion?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: close this issue as an editorial change`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic:  [css-flexbox] Should definite cross size be used to compute flex item's transferred size suggestion?<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5663<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: There's a question about terms we're using in 2 parts of spec. In 9.8 where we define etra ways for lengths to get def we talk about outer cross size. In earlier sections for min size one of the conditions was stated as relying on cross size being defininte. Unclear if one being definite was meant to apply to other term.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Edited spec for more consistent. Didn't have right terms and said "property" waht we want is preferred size. dgrogan confirmed it looked good. Unless other thoughts I think we can close with this fix<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Original commentor just replied saying good<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: I say we close as editorial<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Prop is close this issue and an editorial change<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Obj?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: close this issue as an editorial change<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Thanks for the updates<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5663#issuecomment-722042259 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 5 November 2020 00:09:13 UTC