- From: Rami Yushuvaev via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:17:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> `:nth-children(2)` would be the same as `:has(> :nth-child(2)):not(:has(> :nth-child(3)))` - although I think it's fair to say the latter isn't quite as obvious. The new `:nth-children(2)` is the same as `:has(> :nth-child(2)):not(:has(> :nth-child(3)))`, but with a lower specificity. Just like `:only-child` is the same as `:nth-child(1):nth-last-child(1)`, but with a lower specificity. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ramiy Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5694#issuecomment-721828527 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2020 16:17:45 UTC