- From: Mike Bremford via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:43:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
In that case it's the same complexity as `:has()` - i.e., it's complex (see eg https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3345). `:nth-children(2)` would be the same as `:has(> :nth-child(2)):not(:has(> :nth-child(3)))` - although I think it's fair to say the latter isn't quite as obvious. -- GitHub Notification of comment by faceless2 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5694#issuecomment-721808794 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2020 15:43:48 UTC