- From: Serhii Kulykov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 08:34:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
As a library maintainer, I find the new syntax questionable in terms of developer experience. ```css ::part(form-field):state(pristine) ``` 👍 human friendly 👍 self-explanatory 👎 more verbose ```css ::--form-field:--pristine ``` 👎 confusing 👍 somewhat BEM-ish 👍 fewer bytes Off-topic: what if we make it even more BEM-ish? 🤔 ```css ::__form-field:--pristine ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by web-padawan Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4900#issuecomment-625112662 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 7 May 2020 08:34:26 UTC