W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > March 2020

[csswg-drafts] [css-values-3][spec-rec] Publish CSS Values & Units 3 as a REC (#4846)

From: Sam Sneddon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 23:38:15 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-577417484-1583624294-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
gsnedders has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-values-3][spec-rec] Publish CSS Values & Units 3 as a REC ==
From @atanassov's [last email](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2018JanMar/0110.html), given having something public to point at about what blocks publishing it would be nice:

- DOC - https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/issues-cr-2016
- Looks like only one issue?

AIUI the blockers status are:

- [ ] Write as DOC for the 2019 CR
- [ ] #4840 (drop the at-risk multi-arg `attr()`)
- [ ] Check references v. the [normative reference policy](https://www.w3.org/2013/09/normative-references); currently non-REC normative refs:
  - [ ] [CSS-CASCADE-4]
  - [ ] [CSS-COLOR-4]
  - [ ] [CSS-COUNTER-STYLES-3]
  - [ ] [CSS-DISPLAY-3]
  - [ ] [CSS-IMAGES-4]
  - [ ] [CSS-OVERFLOW-3]
  - [ ] [CSS-SIZING-3]
  - [ ] [CSS-UI-4]
  - [ ] [CSS-VALUES-4] (note this is a normative citation from level 3 to level 4!)
  - [ ] [CSS-WRITING-MODES-4]
  - [ ] [CSS3-BACKGROUND]
  - [ ] [CSS3-IMAGES]
  - [ ] [CSS3CASCADE]
  - [ ] [CSS3PAGE]
  - [ ] [CSS3SYN]
  - [ ] [CSSOM]
  - [ ] [MEDIAQ]
  - [ ] [SELECTORS-4] (note we also cite [SELECTORS-3] which is a REC)
 - [ ] Check test suite status and write an implementation report

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4846 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 7 March 2020 23:38:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:02 UTC