W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] should contain-intrinsic-size affect the aspect ratio of a replaced element? (#5241)

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 23:43:37 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-661449597-1595288616-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
We wouldn't derive an aspect-ratio from c-i-s on an IFRAME, so I don't think we should be doing so for IMG either. Also consider OBJECT, which is more ambiguous about whether it should typically have an intrinsic aspect ratio.

Bitmap images intrinsically have an aspect ratio. The IMG element doesn't.

c-i-s shouldn't introduce an aspect-ratio or not depending magically on what HTML element it's specified on.

GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5241#issuecomment-661449597 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 20 July 2020 23:43:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:11 UTC