Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Does grid-template-areas really expand the explicit grid? (#4914)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-grid] Does grid-template-areas really expand the explicit grid?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Accept edits to spec for explicit grid`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: [css-grid] Does grid-template-areas really expand the explicit grid?<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4914<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4914#issuecomment-609914410<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Issue here is grid-template-rows/columns/areas don't haev to agree number of rows or columns expressing. You can have a template with 5 rows and only put 1.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Question is what defines explicit grid. Explicit rows and columns?<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Browsers agree on behavior but it's not well spec. They are part of explicit grid, can detect by span to -1 line. Will fill space of grid-template-area. Sized as if implicit tracks from grid-auto-rows properites.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Reasonable, want to canonicalize in spec.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: We checked in edits and added tests. If there's objections we can revert. Otherwise current spec has intentions. explicit grid is the larger option and if it's more than rows and columns it's sized by grid-auto<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Thoughts or objections?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Accept edits to spec for explicit grid<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4914#issuecomment-658872532 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 15 July 2020 16:41:14 UTC