- From: Ferdy Christant via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 19:30:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks, the notes seem to have a semantic discussion about whether Flickr-style layouts are also called Masonry. Looks like that is a clear no, it's quite a different layout compared to the core of your proposal. For the interested, here's an epic article explaining how incredibly hard it can be to achieve such a layout: https://medium.com/google-design/google-photos-45b714dfbed1 I don't know if any native CSS layout module could ever achieve that, the only point I have is that if such a thing would be possible, I presume it to be more in-demand compared to vertical Masonry. I believe Masonry is an exceptional need, not a very common one. But that's just an opinion, please don't see it as a dismissal of your idea or proposal. Best of luck! -- GitHub Notification of comment by fchristant Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4650#issuecomment-579921429 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2020 19:31:01 UTC