- From: Nat McCully via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:22:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
When I read "in CJK context" I assume this brings with it a number of CJK typographic conventions like where underline normally is placed relative to the CJK embox, and thus whether the skip-ink feature would be usable as in a typical Latin-based descender-skipping context. Lined emphasis in CJK did not typically skip (or draw behind) the glyphs, but it does get positioned such that collisions are more rare, making it quite different from typical Latin underline. I would think whether or not the underline is contiguous is also a factor in determining behavior (and CJK context). Thoughts? -- GitHub Notification of comment by macnmm Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276#issuecomment-579550351 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2020 01:22:52 UTC