- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 17:56:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The change from ints to numbers in `rgb()` could easily be missed, so I think this needs an example in the spec. It also directly contradicts CSSOM, which is now fine as we resolved today to remove the serailization of RGB from CSSOM and consolidate it all into CSS Color 4; so that text can now have the precision test built in. ``` rgb(146.064 107.457 131.223) is now valid, and equal to rgb(57.28% 42.14% 51.46%) ``` Given the conflict with what CSSOM used to say, this needs tests too. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1891#issuecomment-577796091 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2020 17:56:08 UTC