Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4][cssom] Overlap between the definition of resolving color values and serializing <color> component values. (#982)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `Overlap between the definition of resolving color values and serializing <color> component values.`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: move serialization into color-4`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;stantonm> topic: Overlap between the definition of resolving color values and serializing &lt;color> component values.<br>
&lt;astearns> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/982<br>
&lt;stantonm> chris: css object model has not clear text about how to construct these color strings<br>
&lt;stantonm> ... color-4 should obsolete that part of the model<br>
&lt;stantonm> ... do people agree? or do we think it needs serialization<br>
&lt;stantonm> ... even if you have rgb with percentage, some bits get thrown away<br>
&lt;stantonm> ... should it be in color-4 or OM<br>
&lt;stantonm> emilio: as long as its well defined I don't care<br>
&lt;stantonm> TabAtkins: prefer color spec<br>
&lt;stantonm> leaverou: remove it from css OM and just point to color-4<br>
&lt;stantonm> florian: agree, color-4 now has appropriate infomation to represent that spec<br>
&lt;stantonm> RESOLVED: move serialization into color-4<br>
&lt;stantonm> fantasai: before we remove from OM should we publish it<br>
&lt;stantonm> TabAtkins: publish both after the move<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/982#issuecomment-577740386 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2020 15:47:59 UTC