Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] `background-size` at-risk? (#3742) from CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub on 2020-01-22 (public-css-archive@w3.org from January 2020)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:56:36 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-577254037-1579708595-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

The CSS Working Group just discussed `background-size at-risk`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Close no change.`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;fantasai> Topic: background-size at-risk<br>
&lt;fantasai> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3742<br>
&lt;heycam> fantasai: this one weird case of SVG that doesn't have a size or aspect ratio<br>
&lt;heycam> ... I don't think we should mark the entire property at risk for this<br>
&lt;heycam> ... worst case, if it's the last thing blocking REC, we can make the case it's a bug that will some day get fixed<br>
&lt;heycam> chris: are you saying it is correctly defined but implementations haven't implemented correctly?<br>
&lt;heycam> fantasai: I believe so<br>
&lt;heycam> chris: I'm prepared to argue to leave it then<br>
&lt;heycam> RESOLVED: Close no change.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3742#issuecomment-577254037 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2020 15:56:42 UTC