Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-decor] Consider adding an `all` value to `text-decoration-skip-ink` (#4277)

The CSS Working Group just discussed ``[css-text-decor] Consider adding an `all` value to `text-decoration-skip-ink` ``, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Add an 'always' value to 'text-decoration-skip-ink'`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: [css-text-decor] Consider adding an `all` value to `text-decoration-skip-ink`<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4277<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Right now when you turn on text-decoration-skip-ink you can use auto which is skip everything except cjk. cjk letters usually lower on line and intersect too much with underline. That was a decision I made many years ago; looked at cjk and it was awful so made it not apply<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Other value was none which is don't skip.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Now that there's a property to move underline it's reasonable for an author to want to place underline such that it doesn't intersect. Then having ink-skipping on cjk makes sense. Let's add a 3rd value that does it on everything, even cjk. Makes total sense to me<br>
&lt;fantasai> I agree with doing this, would suggest using always rather than all<br>
&lt;dael> jensimmons: Makes sense to me to give authors rest of power to do what they want. They should have option to force it on even if default for script is off<br>
&lt;dael> florian: Makes sense to me<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: fantasai prefers always instead of all? Any other opinion?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Prop: Add an always value to text-decoration-skip-ink<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objections?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Add an 'always' value to 'text-decoration-skip-ink'<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4277#issuecomment-574778306 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2020 17:56:52 UTC