- From: Hugo via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:18:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Good pictures! > Do you think it is overlap even if 1px is attached? Yes. To me, [2] is overlapping but [1] is not. > I thought we didn't need to include these two cases as overlap cases. Yeah, I don't what's best either, but I'd say [2] should be considered "overlapping" even though only 1px overlaps. 1px gets bigger with zooming. :) > I wonder your opinion With a.X <**=** b.Right, we include [2] but not [1] so let's use **<=** in the formula? Otherwise, I think the formula looks good! When implementing this in Chrome, you will need to use `PhysicalRect::IntersectsInclusively`, not `PhysicalRect::Intersects`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by hugoholgersson Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4483#issuecomment-574079045 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2020 09:18:12 UTC