- From: Timothy Dresser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 18:21:56 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks for your thoughts @dbaron - the multiple font single typeface case is an interesting one. The primary offender I've seen here has been for headings in a webfont, which are generally in a single font, without any variations. That said, most of my digging here has focused on pages with latin scripts. I agree that that we'll need to enable the developer to make tradeoffs here. I think the proposed semantics here around `optional` is one configuration we should support. Does that seem reasonable? Is there a use case for the current definition of `optional` that we'd lose by making this change? -- GitHub Notification of comment by tdresser Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4108#issuecomment-573800490 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 13 January 2020 18:21:57 UTC