- From: Gérard Talbot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:01:11 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
TalbotG has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-text-3] tiny editorial issue in § 4.1. The White Space Processing Rules == In the first Note starting [§ 4.1. The White Space Processing Rules](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-3/#white-space-rules) , also found in the Editor Draft https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#white-space-rules , there seems to be a tiny editorial mistake: "The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) and that consider**ed** syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical." I think the sentence should be instead: "The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) and that consider**s** syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical." Otherwise, the sentence seems awkward or confusing. Or maybe (seems even better now that I read it) the sentence should be rather (**without "that"**): "The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) **and considered** syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical." Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4810 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 02:01:13 UTC