W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > February 2020

[csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] tiny editorial issue in § 4.1. The White Space Processing Rules (#4810)

From: Gérard Talbot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:01:11 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-571771363-1582768869-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
TalbotG has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-text-3] tiny editorial issue in § 4.1. The White Space Processing Rules ==
In the first Note starting [§ 4.1. The White Space Processing Rules](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-3/#white-space-rules) , also found in the Editor Draft
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#white-space-rules
 , there seems to be a tiny editorial mistake:

"The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) and that consider**ed** syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical."

I think the sentence should be instead:

"The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) and that consider**s** syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical."

Otherwise, the sentence seems awkward or confusing.

Or maybe (seems even better now that I read it) the sentence should be rather (**without "that"**):

"The set of characters considered document white space (part of the document content) **and considered** syntactic white space (part of the CSS syntax) are not necessarily identical."


Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4810 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 02:01:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:01 UTC