- From: c933103 via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 17:07:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > I don't think that it's the place of the CSSWG to tell authors what is ready to use on their websites > > I agree, and I think if we do this, the list has to be generated by the authoring community, CSSWG just makes it official by publishing it. > > > Let's think in terms of cycle of adoption and education, which I feel have a 2-5 years cycle > > Agree 100% with @folletto's [comment](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4770#issuecomment-585854814): 1-year cycles are too short to have the sort of marketing impact that this would be meant to serve. (And also I just don't think we have the capacity, we're struggling already to do the snapshots yearly even though they're less subjective. :) It might be a good idea to release a new one every time there's a new Summer Olympics (or something similar) -- GitHub Notification of comment by c933103 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4770#issuecomment-591536247 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2020 17:07:25 UTC