- From: Brian Kardell via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 00:40:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Calling the next collection of modules CSS4 has a few benefits over year names... @fantasai Yeah, I debated whether or not to use `a year name again even because, as I said - _many_ kinds of names could work, and I'm not actually trying to suggest one as much as that it _might_ be valuable to break with the current naming a to avoid confusion. Is that valid or valuable enough..... idk, honestly. > 99.9% of Authors have no idea that CSS is born in specs that have Module Level numbers. @jensimmons We spent a really long time publishing "there is no css4" stuff... Google returns a lot of pieces on this. The actual drafts and MDN documentation and posts and presentations and talks that say 'level 4' or 'level 5' or whatever -- that's all I mean: There is lots of opportunity for confusion floating around out there already. Again... does this really matter.. idk? Please don't read too much into any of these replies: I don't feel super strongly on any of this and i'm definitely not trying to be argumentative about it. I just wanted to make sure that my own worries/thoughts were properly expressed. I fully agree that there are many very good points in this thread and I'm very happy to accept whatever the group/community decides here. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bkardell Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4770#issuecomment-586655919 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 16 February 2020 00:40:46 UTC