- From: Alexis Menard via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 18:32:07 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Out of curiosity, in a device like the Galaxy Fold or the Motorola Razr, and according to the definition provided in the explainer about ‘spanning’, would it resolve to none? If that’s the case, it might be better to specify the ‘single-fold-vertical’ or ‘single-fold-horizontal’ and appropriate env fold variables to potentially accommodate the content on the web page? Something to add to this is that in single screen devices like the Galaxy Z Flip or what Intel showed as the Horseshoe bend concept when the device is partially folded and the fold may or may not be usable (touch not working reliably, image distorted or in a tent mode therefore the fold provides no value). <img src="https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/5P2mtqxdhYKTmn2EaUcFRpwL9wY=/0x0:2040x1360/1200x800/filters:focal(857x517:1183x843)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/66037667/DSC00612.0.jpg" style="max-width:100%"/> So indeed the single-fold-vertical/horizontal properties could be defined even if there is no physical seam because the platform could or should define one arbitrarily. > > To summarize, my concern is with the ‘multiple screen’ wording that keeps appearing in the explainers, since these concepts are useful for single screen devices as well. I second this as per above. -- GitHub Notification of comment by darktears Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4736#issuecomment-584282362 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 10 February 2020 18:32:09 UTC