- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 23:23:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@cdoublev wrote: > and the extra features of `image()` seem also superflous. The extra features come "for free" because `image()` also takes images referenced via `url()`. So, in that regard it makes sense to merge `element()` into `url()`. Though I just realized another little downside of merging it into `url()`. `element()` (or `selector()`, see #5811) might allow different selectors than just ID selectors in the future. Those can't be expressed via `url()`. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1981#issuecomment-748686198 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 20 December 2020 23:23:59 UTC