- From: Brad Kemper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 05:07:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It would be the `:matches(a, b) c :matches(a, b)` one. But it isn't nonsense. The inner a and b could match the same selector without being the same element. Imagine if it was `:matches(div, span) p :matches(div, span)`, for instance, which is a real world equivalent. That would match `div p div`, `span p span`, `div p span`, and `span p div`. Those do actually exist in the wild. -- GitHub Notification of comment by bradkemper Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2895#issuecomment-747870791 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 18 December 2020 05:07:46 UTC