- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 07:03:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Ah, interesting. I think we agree on the behavior, the question is to make sure it is correctly phrased. those after the first one should absolutely wrap, but for the first one, what that sentence tries to say is that since they're not hanging or collapsing, they should be wrapped to the next line **together with whatever is before them**, going back as far as needed to find a wrapping opportunity. So if you have `a b ` and room for three characters, the resulting layout should be ``` |a | |b | ``` as the overflowing space and the b before it get wrapped. But I can see how the existing phrasing can be read to suggest something else. I suspect that the easiest way to make the sentence unambiguously correct is to just delete `; those that overflow must wrap to the next line`, as that's just meant to be a clarification anyway. Combined with `for break-spaces, a soft wrap opportunity exists after every space and every tab.` from earlier in the same section, that's enough to get the normative behavior we want. I think it would be nice to find an alternative wording instead of just deleting it, and I think the one you suggested is differently misleading, but I'm not too sure about a better one. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5783#issuecomment-744221195 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 14 December 2020 07:03:52 UTC