- From: davidsgrogan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 20:15:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > Does the edit in [b05b8d7](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b05b8d71f04cd9fc1c2e15ab844c5d352f213df9) mean that Firefox's current rendering on the reporter's testcase is desirable? > > That's my understanding. Argh, now I'm not so sure based on the text in 5.2.1c that @fantasai pointed out [above](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5665#issuecomment-717542876). I think that spec text implies that `<input>` gets a specified size suggestion of 0, and hence a used min-width of 0. That seems weird to me. 5.2.1 exists to deal with cyclic percentages but there is no cyclic percentage in this case. -- GitHub Notification of comment by davidsgrogan Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5665#issuecomment-738281994 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2020 20:15:31 UTC