W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > December 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing] clarification around Compressible Replaced Elements and min-content size (#5665)

From: davidsgrogan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 20:15:30 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-738281994-1607026528-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> > Does the edit in [b05b8d7](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b05b8d71f04cd9fc1c2e15ab844c5d352f213df9) mean that Firefox's current rendering on the reporter's testcase is desirable?
> That's my understanding.

Argh, now I'm not so sure based on the text in 5.2.1c that @fantasai pointed out [above](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5665#issuecomment-717542876).

I think that spec text implies that `<input>` gets a specified size suggestion of 0, and hence a used min-width of 0.

That seems weird to me. 5.2.1 exists to deal with cyclic percentages but there is no cyclic percentage in this case.

GitHub Notification of comment by davidsgrogan
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5665#issuecomment-738281994 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 3 December 2020 20:15:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:23 UTC