Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing] clarification around Compressible Replaced Elements and min-content size (#5665)

> 5.2.1 exists to deal with cyclic percentages but there is no cyclic percentage in this case.

So 5.2.1c just doesn't apply to the example in the original comment? The flex container has a definite `width:150px`, so `<input width="100%">` is not a cyclic percentage. It's definite and should resolve to a specified size suggestion of `150px` by following just the [Flexbox spec 4.5](

I agree that we should make 5.2.1c reflected clearly in the Flexbox and Grid specs. At least, I was not aware of 5.2.1c while implementing flexbox size suggestions.

GitHub Notification of comment by aethanyc
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in

Received on Thursday, 3 December 2020 22:38:22 UTC