- From: Mike Bremford via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 18:50:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tabatkins, I know it's very expensive and unlikely be be implemented in browsers. My comment was a reply to @SebastianZ - I'd suggest drastically changing the meaning of the `has()` function when you already have shipping implementations isn't a great idea. -- GitHub Notification of comment by faceless2 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4903#issuecomment-608603114 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 3 April 2020 18:50:45 UTC