Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors] has-child selector (#4903)

>> From my experience folks exclusively mean ancestor querying. Eg, they want a child to own how it responds to a class or state findable further up the DOM. @bkardell had it right when using the < character, as a way of visualizing the intent .dark < .my-component {...}.

> I'm not sure what you mean here - you seem to be talking about normal descendant combinators.

I'm sure this was just a misread, `>` is a normal descendant combinator.  This would be an ancestor combinator?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by bkardell
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4903#issuecomment-608595857 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 3 April 2020 18:34:01 UTC