W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] Should the values of image-orientation include the <angle> variants? (#4164)

From: Simon Pieters via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 22:08:04 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-548133471-1572473282-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
It depends:

* Do none of the images have EXIF orientation? The new behavior doesn't affect you.
* Do some of the images have EXIF orientation and you just show the images as-is? If so, some of those images are probably currently shown with the "wrong" orientation, and the new behavior will fix it. (For `img` elements, iOS Safari already does this.)
* Do some of the images have EXIF orientation and you do something to "fix" the orientation on the client side (e.g. CSS transform)? Use `image-orientation: none` to avoid applying the orientation twice.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by zcorpan
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164#issuecomment-548133471 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2019 22:08:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:55 UTC