- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:58:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm fine with this. @Crissov as you say, rec.2020 is the widespread term of use. The full reference is in the references section, so there is no ambiguity. Or we could rename it to rec-itu-r-bt-2020-2-2015 for the ultimate in self-descriptive identifiers. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4056#issuecomment-547948452 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2019 14:58:38 UTC