W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-1] [svg-2] Replacement for ShadowAnimation (#4427)

From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 01:21:06 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-545700462-1571880066-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I think that makes sense, but I wonder if there is any reason `affectsClone` would be false? Should it always just affect the clone(s)?

After all if you called [`commitStyles()`](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#dom-animation-commitstyles) it would update inline style on the element the spec seems pretty clear that, "these cloned element instances remain linked to the referenced source and reflect DOM mutations in the original".

I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the subtleties of the `<use>` and shadow DOM behavior so I'd defer to @emilio on what's best here.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by birtles
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4427#issuecomment-545700462 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2019 01:21:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:55 UTC