- From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 22:50:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@fantasai I agree there's probably not much of a web-compat problem with arbitrary descendant non-`<li>` elements styled as `display:list-item`. But the issue is that `<li>`s might be wrapped, like so:
```html
<ol reversed>
<font>
<li>A</li>
<li>B</li>
<li>C</li>
</font>
</ol>
```
I suspect that's common enough that we need to handle it and your `ol[reversed] > li` rule above wouldn't work for this case. (Also, that rule would give a non-default computed value for `<ol reversed><li style="display:block">` which seems unfortunate, but probably doesn't matter in practice.)
I still think implementing this as a preshint that maps `<ol reversed>` to ` counter-reset: reversed(list-item)` or some such and making that imply a default counter-increment value of -1 in layout is the best solution.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by MatsPalmgren
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4181#issuecomment-544740910 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 21 October 2019 22:50:40 UTC