- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 00:22:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
That is a good point... https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3482#issuecomment-451590359 seems to imply it should be treated the same: > > calc(% + 0px) vs calc(%) > > Sure. There's no case in which these two should be different. Lengths never have magical behavior, so adding it to a % shouldn't add any complications, and in the rare cases where length+% is different than just resolving the % and adding the two together (bg-position), a 0px length is still a no-op. -- GitHub Notification of comment by emilio Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4389#issuecomment-537283816 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2019 00:22:36 UTC