Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Change MAY into MUST regarding calc() on table (#4389)

That is a good point... seems to imply it should be treated the same:

> > calc(% + 0px) vs calc(%)
> Sure. There's no case in which these two should be different. Lengths never have magical behavior, so adding it to a % shouldn't add any complications, and in the rare cases where length+% is different than just resolving the % and adding the two together (bg-position), a 0px length is still a no-op.

GitHub Notification of comment by emilio
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2019 00:22:36 UTC