W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Change MAY into MUST regarding calc() on table (#4389)

From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 00:22:34 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-537283816-1569975752-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
That is a good point... https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3482#issuecomment-451590359 seems to imply it should be treated the same:

> > calc(% + 0px) vs calc(%)
> Sure. There's no case in which these two should be different. Lengths never have magical behavior, so adding it to a % shouldn't add any complications, and in the rare cases where length+% is different than just resolving the % and adding the two together (bg-position), a 0px length is still a no-op.

GitHub Notification of comment by emilio
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4389#issuecomment-537283816 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2019 00:22:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:54 UTC