From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:19:08 +0000

To: public-css-archive@w3.org

Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-554532346-1573852747-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 21:19:08 +0000

To: public-css-archive@w3.org

Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-554532346-1573852747-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Some questions from smfr I'm carrying over from #4505: > Some concrete examples where implementations seem to disagree. How do the following serialize? > > - ``min(1)``: ``min(1)`` or ``1``? > - ``min(1, 2)``: ``min(1, 2)`` or ``1``? > - ``min(min(1))``: ``min(min(1))``, ``min(1)`` or ``1``? > - ``calc(min(1))``: ``calc(min(1))``, ``min(1)`` or ``1`` or other? > > Questions: > > 1. Should simplification ever remove all the math functions? > 2. Should nested math functions of different types be simplified, i.e. is it OK to simplify ``calc(calc(1))`` but not ``calc(min(1))`` -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4399#issuecomment-554532346 using your GitHub accountReceived on Friday, 15 November 2019 21:19:10 UTC

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0
: Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:56 UTC
*