- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 00:24:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
A more complex example: https://jsfiddle.net/2rsLcwg8/ Before #2177 ratios were respected, ignoring the content. With the current spec, ratios are totally screwed. Maximizing tracks using their ratios improves them just a little bit. Not maximizing flexible tracks provides the old behavior (because the minimum contributions are small enough). I think that's the expected behavior. | Before #2177 | Current spec (maximize equally) | | ------------- | -----| | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64963/649637ad1072c4cfbc6c9017b820cfad7671da53" alt="previously" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13e3e/13e3ec1e3ba39651e1c6afa79c35ac4b6dcf1cef" alt="maximize-equally" | | Don't maximize flexible tracks | Maximize with ratios | | ------------- | -----| | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b30ed/b30ed28091f65add848e27cc1ffbdf5841c8a4cb" alt="maximize-none" | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8dd2/f8dd2763b7527793d041e06668f2e4ebd39cdcb0" alt="maximize-ratios" | -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3693#issuecomment-468858430 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 2 March 2019 00:24:50 UTC