W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2019

[csswg-drafts] [css-images] Should the values of image-orientation include the <angle> variants? (#4164)

From: Simon Fraser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 22:02:00 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-475377160-1564610519-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
smfr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-images] Should the values of image-orientation include the <angle> variants? ==
In https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images/#the-image-orientation there's a Note that says that 

> This property is likely going to be deprecated and its functionality moved to HTML. At minimum, it will likely lose all but its initial value and from-image.

Is that still true? Issue #3799 talks about the default value, but not what other values are available.

What are the use cases for <angle> with optional flip?

Also, why is 'image-orientation' missing from css-images-4?

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2019 22:02:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:50 UTC