W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-decor] text-decoration-width claims to be a sub-property of text-decoration, but text-decoration disagrees. (#3993)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 16:06:33 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-512347151-1563379591-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `text-decoration-width claims to be a sub-property of text-decoration, but text-decoration disagrees.`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: text-decoration-width claims to be a sub-property of text-decoration, but text-decoration disagrees.<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3993<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: emilio added this and fantasai commented.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Anything we need to do?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Not unless someone disagrees with making it a sub property<br>
&lt;bradk>  🌎 📆<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: I have not read through the text. Is there a spec change?<br>
&lt;emilio> astearns: I'm fine with fantasai's comment, updating the spec would be nice<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Hang up is text-decor L3 text isn't folded into L4. I need to cross check before I copy over and merge in. L4 is basically a diff spec atm<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: So we'll close this as soon as you cross check and poss. update spec<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yeah<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Any disagreement with that course of action?<br>
&lt;dael> ??: nope<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Let's leave it at that.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3993#issuecomment-512347151 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2019 16:06:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:50 UTC