[csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-1] 2D rotations are not actually defined in a clear way (#4077)

• From: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
• Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 23:52:16 +0000
• To: public-css-archive@w3.org
• Message-ID: <issues.opened-462958498-1562025134-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

bzbarsky has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-transforms-1] 2D rotations are not actually defined in a clear way ==
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-1/#RotateDefined says:

>  A 2D rotation with the parameter alpha is equivalent to a 3D rotation with vector [0,0,1] and parameter alpha. 

Presumably this is meaning to reference the definition at https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-2/#Rotate3dDefined but that's not at all clear from the text.  This definition should have a link to css-transforms-2.

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4077 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 1 July 2019 23:52:18 UTC