W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > January 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-logical] Should the `inset` shorthand allow quirks in their lengths like the individual properties do? (#3525)

From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:01:25 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-454810069-1547650884-sysbot+gh@w3.org> 
Ah, I overlooked this. Blink allows the quirk, because the easy way to parse the shorthand was using the longhands.

I don't have a strong opinion, if `inset` remains a shorthand of only the physical properties it may make some sense to allow the quirk in order to have a consistent syntax. But if it's going to become a shorthand of both logical or physical longhands [like fantasai wants](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2988#issuecomment-417017014), then I wouldn't allow it.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3525#issuecomment-454810069 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2019 15:01:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:42 UTC